omniture

Study Favours TAXUS(TM) Stent Over Cypher(TM) Stent and Bare-Metal Stents in Diabetic Patients

Boston Scientific Corporation
2006-11-20 10:35 1541

Lower Re-Intervention Rates for the TAXUS Stent in Diabetic Patients

NATICK, Mass. and CHICAGO, Nov. 20 /Xinhua-PRNewswire/ -- Boston

Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX) today welcomed a presentation by Joost

Daemen, M.D., and Patrick Serruys, M.D., entitled "The Long Term Efficacy of

Sirolimus-eluting (SES) and Paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) as Compared to

Bare-Metal Stents (BMS) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus." Data were

presented from the T-SEARCH/RESEARCH registry, a 708-patient, real-world

registry managed from the Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center in

Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The presentation reports that the TAXUS(TM) stent

(PES) exhibited a lower re-intervention rate and equal or lower instances of

death or heart attack than the Cypher(TM) stent (SES) and bare-metal stents

(BMS). The data were presented at the annual American Heart Association (AHA)

Scientific Sessions in Chicago.

The presentation reported two-year results, which trended in favor of the

TAXUS stent compared to the Cypher stent and BMS in both target vessel

revascularization (TVR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates. The

TVR rate for the TAXUS stent was 9.7 percent compared to 15.3 percent for the

Cypher stent (p=0.06) and 19.5 percent for BMS (p=0.0034). Rates of TVR for

the Cypher stent and BMS were comparable (p=0.97). The study also reported

rates of MACE with the TAXUS stent of 21.2 percent compared to 28.9 percent

for the Cypher stent (p=0.058 PES vs. SES) and 29.7 percent for BMS (p=0.04

PES vs. BMS). The presenter concluded that the MACE data showed no benefit to

SES as compared to BMS in the study’s patient population, and that there was

a trend toward better TVR outcomes with PES.

Two-year cumulative incidence of mortality was comparable among the three

stent groups, with rates of 11.5 percent for the TAXUS stent, 13.3 percent

for the Cypher stent and 9.8 percent for BMS. The two-year stent thrombosis

rate for the TAXUS stent was lower than that of the Cypher stent (2.4 percent

versus 4.4 percent), however, the difference was not statistically

significant (p=0.29). Stent thrombosis for BMS was 0.8 percent, which was not

significantly different from TAXUS (p=0.18). Stent thrombosis for Cypher at

two years was significantly higher compared to BMS (p=0.015).

"This study provides further insight into the strong performance of the

TAXUS stent in diabetic patients and adds to the growing body of TAXUS stent

data in this difficult-to-treat patient population," said Paul LaViolette,

Chief Operating Officer of Boston Scientific. "These results are particularly

compelling because they represent patients with multiple complexities, the

kind physicians treat every day in real-world settings. We are also pleased

that the data demonstrated that the safety profile of the TAXUS stent was

comparable to -- or better than -- that of bare-metal stents."

Diabetic patients generally have more long-term complications than

interventional cardiology patients as a whole, making results in diabetic

patients with heart disease worthy of note when evaluating overall stent

performance. The important and growing diabetic patient subset accounts for

approximately one-quarter of all coronary interventional procedures worldwide

(1).

Boston Scientific is a worldwide developer, manufacturer and marketer of

medical devises whose products are used in a broad range of interventional

medical specialties. For more information, please visit:

http://www.bostonscientific.com .

This press release contains forward-looking statements. Boston Scientific

wishes to caution the reader of this press release that actual results may

differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements and may be

adversely affected by, among other things, risks associated with new product

development and commercialization, clinical trials, intellectual property,

regulatory approvals, competitive offerings, Boston Scientific’s over all

business strategy, and other factors described in Boston Scientific’s

filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(1) Kereiakes DJ and Young JJ. Percutaneous coronary

revascularization of diabetic patients in the era of

drug-eluting stents. Rev Cariovasc Med 2005: 6 (suppl 1): S48-S58

Source: Boston Scientific Corporation
collection