<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>GLOBAL CENTRE FOR MARITIME DECARBONISATION LIMITED</title>
	<language>en_US</language>
	<generator>PRN Asia</generator>
	<description><![CDATA[we tell your story to the world!]]></description>
		<item>
		<title>World's first vessel retrofit fund using a pay-as-you-save repayment mechanism closes at USD 35M</title>
		<author></author>
		<pubDate>2025-11-20 16:29:00</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[
 * Fund for Energy Efficiency Technologies (FEET) provides up to 100% upfront 
financing for retrofits and introduces a pay-as-you-save repayment mechanism 
linked directly to verified fuel and regulatory savings 
 * By offering unsecured leases on retrofits, FEET decouples retrofit 
financing from vessel mortgages 
 * Through a blended financing structure and a diversified project portfolio, 
FEET balances financial risk while keeping financing costs competitive SINGAPORE
,Nov. 20, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation 
(GCMD), AIM Horizon Investments and their partners today announced the 
successful closing of theFund for Energy Efficiency Technologies (FEET), 
securing total commitments of up toUSD 35M, exceeding its initial target. 

As the world's first fund for vessel retrofits leveraging a pay-as-you-save 
repayment mechanism, FEET directly addresses the long-standing financial 
barriers hindering the sector's uptake of vessel retrofits. This fund has drawn 
strong interest from across the maritime value chain, including equipment 
manufacturers, shipowners, and investors.

GCMD provides catalytic equity and is FEET's appointed decarbonisation 
advisor. FEET is managed by AIM Horizon Investments. Formerly known as FPG AIM 
Capital, AIM Horizon Investments is aSingapore-based fund manager specialising 
in maritime and aviation funds for institutional and accredited investors. 
Shareholders of AIM Horizon Investments hold the fund's commercial equity 
position, while the Development Bank of Japan Inc. (DBJ) holds the preferred 
equity position. DBS Bank and ING (which acted as Coordinating Bank) have in 
principle agreed to provide senior debt financing.

Scaling EET adoption to reduce emissions

Improving energy efficiency remains one of the most effective strategies to 
reduce emissions and fuel costs. Energy Efficiency Technologies (EETs), such as 
wind-assisted propulsion systems (WAPS)[1] and air lubrication systems (ALS)[2]
, can deliver immediate fuel savings, assisting shipowners to stay competitive 
amid tightening regional carbon regulations. However, even with a retrofit 
market valued at overUSD 20B, uncertainties around EET performance and access 
to financing continue to limit uptake.

A primary difficulty restricting adoption is the inherently variable fuel 
savings from EET retrofits, which depend on operational and environmental 
factors, such as routing and weather conditions. The lack of standardised 
methodologies to accurately measure fuel savings further challenges uptake.

This uncertainty has made the return on investment period difficult to 
predict and has exacerbated the split-incentive issue, where shipowners are 
expected to invest in retrofits whereas charterers realise savings. 

Verified savings at the core of pay-as-you-save 

A pay-as-you-save repayment mechanism addresses payback uncertainty with EETs 
by directly linking repayment to quantified and verified fuel and regulatory 
savings. Deploying this mechanism requires robust data collection and analysis 
to isolate the retrofit's contribution to overall fuel savings.

To this end, GCMD has undertaken EET performance pilots, equipping vessels 
with additional sensors to acquire high-precision, high-resolution data and 
applying rigorous data analytics to quantify fuel savings with statistical 
confidence. As more data is collected across diverse operating and 
environmental conditions, these datasets can be used to model and predict 
savings under varying scenarios.

Unsecured financing solution to accelerate EET uptake

Commercial vessels are typically financed through loans which have a first 
priority mortgage over the vessel. As the cost of EETs is small relative to the 
vessel's value, it is not practical for shipowners or the existing secured 
financiers to provide vessel security to prospective retrofit financiers. 
Consequently, unsecured financing solutions are needed to accelerate the uptake 
of EETs.

FEET decouples retrofit financing from vessel mortgages by offering unsecured 
leases. Under this structure, FEET provides up to 100% financing for the 
equipment and associated installation and sensorisation costs, and leases the 
hardware to shipowners. In return, shipowners make repayments linked directly 
to verified fuel and regulatory savings. At the end of the lease, ownership of 
the EET is transferred to the shipowner for a nominal fee.

Blended financing and project diversification to manage risks

A blend of catalytic capital, commercial and preferred equities, as well as 
senior debt, allows FEET to balance financial risk while keeping financing 
costs competitive. By investing in a diverse portfolio of projects across 
technologies, manufacturers, vessel owners and types, FEET spreads investment 
exposure across its portfolio and enhances fund resilience.

Several projects have already been identified and have progressed to the 
final investment decision stage, reflecting strong industry interest and 
confidence. The fund remains open to shipowners and ship operators seeking 
support for adopting EETs.

Poised for scale 

FEET is designed to scale beyond this initial closing, recognising the vast 
market size and shipping sector's pressing decarbonisation needs. GCMD and AIM 
Horizon Investments are targeting to scale the fund toUSD 500M by 2030, capable 
of supporting around 200 ships.

Scaling FEET will create a virtuous cycle: as the fund grows in size and its 
projects diversify, financing costs will decrease, and richer performance data 
on EET will be generated. This, in turn, will spur further innovation and 
deliver greater benefits for shipping companies, investors and EET 
manufacturers.

Professor Lynn Loo, CEO, GCMD, said, "Bringing FEET to life has taken 
persistence and a willingness from everyone involved to step into the unknown. 
There was no playbook; our teams were learning as we went. This is exactly the 
kind of collaborative, problem-solving mindset needed to move the needle on 
maritime decarbonisation. My hope is that FEET will accelerate the uptake of 
shipboard energy efficiency solutions and help unlock the scale of action 
needed to turn the industry's decarbonisation ambition into tangible progress."

Michiel Muller, Partner AIM Horizon & FPG AIM, said, "We are proud to work in 
this partnership and bring an innovative financial product for maritime 
decarbonisation. It has taken a huge collective effort to create a solution 
that immediately reduces carbon emissions and has competitive economics that 
will enable it to really scale. In GCMD we have found a like-minded partner 
whose professional and scientific approach impressed us since the start, and it 
was an opportunity to further expand our long-standing relationships with DBJ, 
ING and DBS Bank."

Corporate Finance Department, Division 4, DBJ, said, "We believe that the 
adoption of EETs is an effective solution for maritime decarbonisation. FEET 
provides a platform to support this, and DBJ has decided to invest in the fund. 
We are proud to be involved in such an international and ambitious initiative, 
and we sincerely hope that FEET's efforts will expand and contribute to the 
decarbonisation of the maritime industry."

Stephen Fewster, Global Head of Shipping, ING, said, "At ING we aim to put 
sustainability at the heart of what we do. We are therefore delighted and 
honoured to have collaborated with GCMD and our partners to drive the adoption 
of energy efficiency retrofits which are key for shipping's decarbonisation. We 
look forward to further cooperation with GCMD and scaling this innovative 
solution to accelerate the industry's transition to Net Zero."

Max Lim, Managing Director and Group Head, Shipping, Aviation, Logistics & 
Transportation, DBS, said, "Shipping is the lifeblood of global trade – moving 
about80% of all goods across the world 
<https://unctad.org/news/shipping-data-unctad-releases-new-seaborne-trade-statistics>
. At the same time, the sector accounts for about3% of global greenhouse gas 
emissions 
<https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/04/why-reducing-barriers-for-maritime-fuel-projects-is-key-to-progressing-on-decarbonization/>
. Decarbonising this industry represents both a major challenge and a 
compelling opportunity. The FEET initiative not only supports the adoption of 
technologies for energy efficiency, but also seeks to help shipowners manage 
financial and climate risks. DBS is proud to be a partner in this pioneering 
effort that endeavours to make the transition to cleaner shipping both 
commercially viable and scalable."

About the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation

The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) was established as a 
non-profit organisation on1 August 2021 with a mission to support the 
decarbonisation of the maritime industry by shaping standards, deploying 
solutions, financing projects, and fostering collaboration across sectors.

Founded by six industry partners namely BHP, BW Group, Eastern Pacific 
Shipping, Foundation Det Norske Veritas, Ocean Network Express and Seatrium, 
GCMD also receives funding from the Maritime and Port Authority ofSingapore 
(MPA) for qualifying research and development programmes and projects. Since 
its founding, bp, Hanwha Ocean, Hapag-Lloyd, NYK Line and PSA International 
have joined as Strategic partners. To-date, over 130 centre- and project-level 
partners have joined GCMD, contributing funds, expertise and in-kind support to 
accelerate the deployment of scalable low-carbon technologies and lowering 
adoption barriers. 

Since its establishment, GCMD has launched four key initiatives to close 
technical and operational gaps in: deploying ammonia as a marine fuel, 
developing an assurance framework for drop-in green fuels, unlocking the carbon 
value chain through onboard carbon capture and articulating the value chain of 
captured carbon dioxide as well as closing the data-financing gap to widen the 
adoption of energy efficiency technologies.

GCMD is strategically located in Singapore, the world's largest bunkering hub 
and busiest transshipment port. For more information, go towww.gcformd.org 
<http://www.gcformd.org/>.

About AIM Horizon Investments

AIM Horizon Investments (formerly known as FPG AIM Capital) is a Singapore
-based, licensed asset manager focused on private investments in the maritime 
and aviation sectors. The firm is led by an experienced team with over 80 years 
of collective expertise in fund management and transportation finance.

AIM Horizon Investments is affiliated with FPG AIM, which since 2012 has 
directly sourced and structured more thanUS$23 billion of shipping, container, 
and aircraft transactions. The group's industry-leading team of 26 specialists 
operates from key transportation hubs acrossAsia, EMEA, and the Americas, and 
has received multiple awards for innovative financing solutions.

About Development Bank of Japan Inc.

DBJ is a wholly government-owned financial institution in Japan, and its 
corporate mission is "Applying financial expertise to design the future." Its 
ship finance team has extensive experience in the maritime industry, serving 
both Japanese and international clients.

One of the team's recent areas of focus is supporting maritime 
decarbonisation through financial solutions.

About ING

ING is a global financial institution with a strong European base, offering 
banking services through its operating company ING Bank. The purpose of ING 
Bank is: empowering people to stay a step ahead in life and in business. ING 
Bank's more than 60,000 employees offer retail and wholesale banking services 
to customers in over 100 countries.

ING Group shares are listed on the exchanges of Amsterdam (INGA NA, INGA.AS), 
Brussels and on the New York Stock Exchange (ADRs: ING US, ING.N).

ING aims to put sustainability at the heart of what we do. Our policies and 
actions are assessed by independent research and ratings providers, which give 
updates on them annually. ING's ESG rating by MSCI was reconfirmed by MSCI as 
'AA' inAugust 2024 for the fifth year. As of December 2023, in Sustainalytics' 
view, ING's management of ESG material risk is 'Strong'. Our current ESG Risk 
Rating, is 17.2 (Low Risk). ING Group shares are also included in major 
sustainability and ESG index products of leading providers. Here are some 
examples: Euronext, STOXX, Morningstar and FTSE Russell. Society is 
transitioning to a low-carbon economy. So are our clients, and so is ING. We 
finance a lot of sustainable activities, but we still finance more that's not. 
See how we're progressing oning.com/climate <http://ing.com/climate>.

About DBS

DBS is a leading financial services group in Asia with a presence in 19 
markets. Headquartered and listed inSingapore, DBS is in the three key Asian 
axes of growth:Greater China, Southeast Asia and South Asia. The bank's "AA-" 
and "Aa1" credit ratings are among the highest in the world.

Recognised for its global leadership, DBS has been named "World's Best Bank 
<https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_named_Worlds_Best_Bank_for_fifth_year_running>
" by Global Finance, "World's Best Bank 
<https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_conferred_three_global_awards_including_the_most_prestigious_Worlds_Best_Bank_accolade_by_Euromoney_2025>
" by Euromoney and "Global Bank of the Year 
<https://www.dbs.com/about-us/who-we-are/awards-accolades/a-world-first/awards-2021#global-bank-of-the-year-2021>
" by The Banker. The bank is at the forefront of leveraging digital technology 
to shape the future of banking, having been named "World's Best Digital Bank 
<https://www.dbs.com/about-us/who-we-are/awards-accolades/a-world-first/awards-2021#world-best-digital-bank-2021>
" by Euromoney and the world's "Most Innovative in Digital Banking 
<https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_clinches_global_accolade_for_innovation_in_digital_banking>
" by The Banker. In addition, DBS has been accorded the "Safest Bank in Asia 
<https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_recognised_as_Safest_Bank_in_Asia_yet_again_2025>
" award by Global Finance for 17 consecutive years from 2009 to 2025.

DBS provides a full range of services in consumer, SME and corporate banking. 
As a bank born and bred inAsia, DBS understands the intricacies of doing 
business in the region's most dynamic markets.

DBS is committed to building lasting relationships with customers, as it 
banks the Asian way. Through the DBS Foundation, the bank creates impact beyond 
banking by uplifting lives and livelihoods of those in need. It provides 
essential needs to the underprivileged, and fosters inclusion by equipping the 
underserved with financial and digital literacy skills. It also nurtures 
innovative social enterprises that create positive impact.

With its extensive network of operations in Asia and emphasis on engaging and 
empowering its staff, DBS presents exciting career opportunities. For more 
information, please visitwww.dbs.com <https://www.dbs.com/default.page>

[1] WAPS harnesses natural wind power to supplement vessel propulsion.

[2] ALS creates a layer of air bubbles along the vessel's hull below the 
waterline, reducing friction as the ship moves through the water.

 

]]></description>
		<detail><![CDATA[<ul type="disc"> 
 <li><i>Fund for Energy Efficiency Technologies (FEET) provides up to 100% upfront financing for retrofits and introduces a pay-as-you-save repayment mechanism linked directly to verified fuel and regulatory savings</i></li> 
 <li><i>By offering unsecured leases on retrofits, FEET&nbsp;decouples retrofit financing from vessel mortgages </i></li> 
 <li><i>Through a blended financing structure and a diversified project portfolio, FEET balances financial risk while keeping financing costs competitive</i></li> 
</ul> 
<p><span class="legendSpanClass"><span class="xn-location">SINGAPORE</span></span>, <span class="legendSpanClass"><span class="xn-chron">Nov. 20, 2025</span></span> /PRNewswire/ -- The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD), AIM Horizon Investments and their partners today announced the successful closing of the <b>Fund for Energy Efficiency Technologies (FEET</b>), securing total commitments of up to <span class="xn-money">USD 35M</span>, exceeding its initial target.&nbsp;</p> 
<p>As the world's first fund for vessel retrofits leveraging a pay-as-you-save repayment mechanism, FEET directly addresses the long-standing financial barriers hindering the sector's uptake of vessel retrofits. This fund has drawn strong interest from across the maritime value chain, including equipment manufacturers, shipowners, and investors.</p> 
<p>GCMD provides catalytic equity and is FEET's appointed decarbonisation advisor. FEET is managed by AIM Horizon Investments. Formerly known as FPG AIM Capital, AIM Horizon Investments is a <span class="xn-location">Singapore</span>-based fund manager specialising in maritime and aviation funds for institutional and accredited investors. Shareholders of AIM Horizon Investments hold the fund's commercial equity position, while the Development Bank of Japan Inc. (DBJ) holds the preferred equity position. DBS Bank and ING (which acted as Coordinating Bank) have in principle agreed to provide senior debt financing.</p> 
<p><b>Scaling EET adoption to reduce emissions</b></p> 
<p>Improving energy efficiency remains one of the most effective strategies to reduce emissions and fuel costs. Energy Efficiency Technologies (EETs), such as wind-assisted propulsion systems (WAPS)<sup>[1]</sup> and air lubrication systems (ALS)<sup>[2]</sup>, can deliver immediate fuel savings, assisting shipowners to stay competitive amid tightening regional carbon regulations. However, even with a retrofit market valued at over <span class="xn-money">USD 20B</span>, uncertainties around EET performance and access to financing continue to limit uptake.</p> 
<p>A primary difficulty restricting adoption is the inherently variable fuel savings from EET retrofits, which depend on operational and environmental factors, such as routing and weather conditions. The lack of standardised methodologies to accurately measure fuel savings further challenges uptake.</p> 
<p>This uncertainty has made the return on investment period difficult to predict and has exacerbated the split-incentive issue, where shipowners are expected to invest in retrofits whereas charterers realise savings.&nbsp;</p> 
<p><b>Verified savings at the core of pay-as-you-save </b></p> 
<p>A pay-as-you-save repayment mechanism addresses payback uncertainty with EETs by directly linking repayment to quantified and verified fuel and regulatory savings. Deploying this mechanism requires robust data collection and analysis to isolate the retrofit's contribution to overall fuel savings.</p> 
<p>To this end, GCMD has undertaken EET performance pilots, equipping vessels with additional sensors to acquire high-precision, high-resolution data and applying rigorous data analytics to quantify fuel savings with statistical confidence. As more data is collected across diverse operating and environmental conditions, these datasets can be used to model and predict savings under varying scenarios.</p> 
<p><b>Unsecured financing solution to accelerate EET uptake</b></p> 
<p>Commercial vessels are typically financed through loans which have a first priority mortgage over the vessel. As the cost of EETs is small relative to the vessel's value, it is not practical for shipowners or the existing secured financiers to provide vessel security to prospective retrofit financiers. Consequently, unsecured financing solutions are needed to accelerate the uptake of EETs.</p> 
<p>FEET decouples retrofit financing from vessel mortgages by offering unsecured leases. Under this structure, FEET provides up to 100% financing for the equipment and associated installation and sensorisation costs, and leases the hardware to shipowners. In return, shipowners make repayments linked directly to verified fuel and regulatory savings. At the end of the lease, ownership of the EET is transferred to the shipowner for a nominal fee.</p> 
<p><b>Blended financing and project diversification to manage risks</b></p> 
<p>A blend of catalytic capital, commercial and preferred equities, as well as senior debt, allows FEET to balance financial risk while keeping financing costs competitive. By investing in a diverse portfolio of projects across technologies, manufacturers, vessel owners and types, FEET spreads investment exposure across its portfolio and enhances fund resilience.</p> 
<p>Several projects have already been identified and have progressed to the final investment decision stage, reflecting strong industry interest and confidence. The fund remains open to shipowners and ship operators seeking support for adopting EETs.</p> 
<p><b>Poised for scale </b></p> 
<p>FEET is designed to scale beyond this initial closing, recognising the vast market size and shipping sector's pressing decarbonisation needs. GCMD and AIM Horizon Investments are targeting to scale the fund to <span class="xn-money">USD 500M</span> by 2030, capable of supporting around&nbsp;200 ships.</p> 
<p>Scaling FEET will create a virtuous cycle: as the fund grows in size and its projects diversify, financing costs will decrease, and richer performance data on EET will be generated. This, in turn, will spur further innovation and deliver greater benefits for shipping companies, investors and EET manufacturers.</p> 
<p><b>Professor <span class="xn-person">Lynn Loo</span>, CEO, GCMD</b>, said, &quot;Bringing FEET to life has taken persistence and a willingness from everyone involved to step into the unknown. There was no playbook; our teams were learning as we went. This is exactly the kind of collaborative, problem-solving mindset needed to move the needle on maritime decarbonisation. My hope is that FEET will accelerate the uptake of shipboard energy efficiency solutions and help unlock the scale of action needed to turn the industry's decarbonisation ambition into tangible progress.&quot;</p> 
<p><b><span class="xn-person">Michiel Muller</span>, Partner AIM Horizon &amp; FPG AIM,</b>&nbsp;said, &quot;We are proud to work in this partnership and bring an innovative financial product for maritime decarbonisation. It has taken a huge collective effort to create a solution that immediately reduces carbon emissions and has competitive economics that will enable it to really scale. In GCMD we have found a like-minded partner whose professional and scientific approach impressed us since the start, and it was an opportunity to further expand our long-standing relationships with DBJ, ING and DBS Bank.&quot;</p> 
<p><b>Corporate Finance Department, Division 4, DBJ, </b>said,&nbsp;&quot;We believe that the adoption of EETs is an effective solution for maritime decarbonisation. FEET provides a platform to support this, and DBJ has decided to invest in the fund. We are proud to be involved in such an international and ambitious initiative, and we sincerely hope that FEET's efforts will expand and contribute to the decarbonisation of the maritime industry.&quot;</p> 
<p><b><span class="xn-person">Stephen Fewster</span>, Global Head of Shipping, ING</b>, said, &quot;At ING we aim to put sustainability at the heart of what we do. We are therefore delighted and honoured to have collaborated with GCMD and our partners to drive the adoption of energy efficiency retrofits which are key for shipping's decarbonisation. We look forward to further cooperation with GCMD and scaling this innovative solution to accelerate the industry's transition to Net Zero.&quot;</p> 
<p><b><span class="xn-person">Max Lim</span>, Managing Director and Group Head, Shipping, Aviation, Logistics &amp; Transportation, DBS,</b>&nbsp;said, &quot;Shipping is the lifeblood of global trade – moving about <a href="https://unctad.org/news/shipping-data-unctad-releases-new-seaborne-trade-statistics" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">80% of all goods across the world</a>. At the same time, the sector accounts for about <a href="https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/04/why-reducing-barriers-for-maritime-fuel-projects-is-key-to-progressing-on-decarbonization/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">3% of global greenhouse gas emissions</a>. Decarbonising this industry represents both a major challenge and a compelling opportunity. The FEET initiative not only supports the adoption of technologies for energy efficiency, but also seeks to help shipowners manage financial and climate risks. DBS is proud to be a partner in this pioneering effort that endeavours to make the transition to cleaner shipping both commercially viable and scalable.&quot;</p> 
<p><b>About the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation</b></p> 
<p>The Global Centre for Maritime&nbsp;Decarbonisation (GCMD) was established as a non-profit organisation on <span class="xn-chron">1 August 2021</span> with a mission to support the decarbonisation of the maritime industry by shaping standards, deploying solutions, financing projects, and fostering collaboration across sectors.</p> 
<p>Founded by six industry partners namely BHP, BW Group, Eastern Pacific Shipping, Foundation Det Norske Veritas, Ocean Network Express and Seatrium, GCMD also receives funding from the Maritime and Port Authority of <span class="xn-location">Singapore</span> (MPA) for qualifying research and development programmes and projects. Since its founding, bp, Hanwha Ocean, Hapag-Lloyd, NYK Line and PSA International have joined as Strategic partners. To-date, over 130 centre- and project-level partners have joined GCMD, contributing funds, expertise and in-kind support to accelerate the deployment of scalable low-carbon technologies and lowering adoption barriers.&nbsp;</p> 
<p>Since its establishment, GCMD has launched four key initiatives to close technical and operational gaps in: deploying ammonia as a marine fuel, developing an assurance framework for drop-in green fuels, unlocking the carbon value chain through onboard carbon capture and articulating the value chain of captured carbon dioxide as well as closing the data-financing gap to widen the adoption of energy efficiency technologies.</p> 
<p>GCMD is strategically located in <span class="xn-location">Singapore</span>, the world's largest bunkering hub and busiest transshipment port. For more information, go to <a href="http://www.gcformd.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">www.gcformd.org</a>.</p> 
<p><b>About AIM Horizon Investments</b></p> 
<p>AIM Horizon Investments (formerly known as FPG AIM Capital) is a <span class="xn-location">Singapore</span>-based, licensed asset manager focused on private investments in the maritime and aviation sectors. The firm is led by an experienced team with over 80 years of collective expertise in fund management and transportation finance.</p> 
<p>AIM Horizon Investments is affiliated with FPG AIM, which since 2012 has directly sourced and structured more than <span class="xn-money">US$23 billion</span> of shipping, container, and aircraft transactions. The group's industry-leading team of 26 specialists operates from key transportation hubs across <span class="xn-location">Asia</span>, EMEA, and the Americas, and has received multiple awards for innovative financing solutions.</p> 
<p><b>About Development Bank of Japan Inc.</b></p> 
<p>DBJ is a wholly government-owned financial institution in <span class="xn-location">Japan</span>, and its corporate mission is &quot;Applying financial expertise to design the future.&quot; Its ship finance team has extensive experience in the maritime industry, serving both Japanese and international clients.</p> 
<p>One of the team's recent areas of focus is supporting maritime decarbonisation through financial solutions.</p> 
<p><b>About ING</b></p> 
<p>ING is a global financial institution with a strong European base, offering banking services through its operating company ING Bank. The purpose of ING Bank is: empowering people to stay a step ahead in life and in business. ING Bank's more than 60,000 employees offer retail and wholesale banking services to customers in over 100 countries.</p> 
<p>ING Group shares are listed on the exchanges of <span class="xn-location">Amsterdam</span> (<span class="xn-person">INGA NA</span>, INGA.AS), <span class="xn-location">Brussels</span> and on the New York Stock Exchange (ADRs: <span class="xn-person">ING US</span>, ING.N).</p> 
<p>ING aims to put sustainability at the heart of what we do. Our policies and actions are assessed by independent research and ratings providers, which give updates on them annually. ING's ESG rating by MSCI was reconfirmed by MSCI as 'AA' in <span class="xn-chron">August 2024</span> for the fifth year. As of <span class="xn-chron">December 2023</span>, in Sustainalytics' view, ING's management of ESG material risk is 'Strong'. Our current ESG Risk Rating, is 17.2 (Low Risk). ING Group shares are also included in major sustainability and ESG index products of leading providers. Here are some examples: Euronext, STOXX, Morningstar and FTSE Russell. Society is transitioning to a low-carbon economy. So are our clients, and so is ING. We finance a lot of sustainable activities, but we still finance more that's not. See how we're progressing on <a href="http://ing.com/climate" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">ing.com/climate</a>.</p> 
<p><b>About DBS</b></p> 
<p>DBS is a leading financial services group in <span class="xn-location">Asia</span> with a presence in 19 markets. Headquartered and listed in <span class="xn-location">Singapore</span>, DBS is in the three key Asian axes of growth: <span class="xn-location">Greater China</span>, <span class="xn-location">Southeast Asia</span> and <span class="xn-location">South Asia</span>. The bank's &quot;AA-&quot; and &quot;Aa1&quot; credit ratings are among the highest in the world.</p> 
<p>Recognised for its global leadership, DBS has been named &quot;<a href="https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_named_Worlds_Best_Bank_for_fifth_year_running" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">World's Best Bank</a>&quot; by Global Finance, &quot;<a href="https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_conferred_three_global_awards_including_the_most_prestigious_Worlds_Best_Bank_accolade_by_Euromoney_2025" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">World's Best Bank</a>&quot; by Euromoney and &quot;<a href="https://www.dbs.com/about-us/who-we-are/awards-accolades/a-world-first/awards-2021#global-bank-of-the-year-2021" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">Global Bank of the Year</a>&quot; by The Banker. The bank is at the forefront of leveraging digital technology to shape the future of banking, having been named &quot;<a href="https://www.dbs.com/about-us/who-we-are/awards-accolades/a-world-first/awards-2021#world-best-digital-bank-2021" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">World's Best Digital Bank</a>&quot; by Euromoney and the world's &quot;<a href="https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_clinches_global_accolade_for_innovation_in_digital_banking" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">Most Innovative in Digital Banking</a>&quot; by The Banker. In addition, DBS has been accorded the &quot;<a href="https://www.dbs.com/newsroom/DBS_recognised_as_Safest_Bank_in_Asia_yet_again_2025" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">Safest Bank in <span class="xn-location">Asia</span></a>&quot; award by Global Finance for 17 consecutive years from 2009 to 2025.</p> 
<p>DBS provides a full range of services in consumer, SME and corporate banking. As a bank born and bred in <span class="xn-location">Asia</span>, DBS understands the intricacies of doing business in the region's most dynamic markets.</p> 
<p>DBS is committed to building lasting relationships with customers, as it banks the Asian way. Through the DBS Foundation, the bank creates impact beyond banking by uplifting lives and livelihoods of those in need. It provides essential needs to the underprivileged, and fosters inclusion by equipping the underserved with financial and digital literacy skills. It also nurtures innovative social enterprises that create positive impact.</p> 
<p>With its extensive network of operations in <span class="xn-location">Asia</span> and emphasis on engaging and empowering its staff, DBS presents exciting career opportunities. For more information, please visit <a href="https://www.dbs.com/default.page" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF">www.dbs.com</a></p> 
<div> 
 <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="1" class="prnbcc"> 
  <tbody> 
   <tr> 
    <td class="prngen2" colspan="1" rowspan="1"><p class="prnml4"><span class="prnews_span"><sup>[1]</sup> WAPS harnesses natural wind power to supplement vessel propulsion.</span></p> </td> 
   </tr> 
   <tr> 
    <td class="prngen2" colspan="1" rowspan="1"><p class="prnml4"><span class="prnews_span"><sup>[2]</sup> ALS creates a layer of air bubbles along the vessel's hull below the waterline, reducing friction as the ship moves through the water.</span></p> </td> 
   </tr> 
  </tbody> 
 </table> 
</div> 
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></detail>
		<source><![CDATA[Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD)]]></source>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successful ammonia transfers in the Pilbara yield key safety and operational insights for future ammonia bunkering operations</title>
		<author></author>
		<pubDate>2025-06-13 12:15:00</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[
 * Comprehensive safety studies confirm that ship-to-ship ammonia transfer at 
anchorage can be both safe and practicable 
 * Thorough planning, infrastructure readiness, vessel compatibility and clear 
communications are key to ensuring successful ammonia transfers SINGAPORE, June 
13, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) 
today released a comprehensive report detailing the learnings of a pioneering 
pilot successfully completed on 14 September 2024. The pilot involved the 
ship-to-ship transfer of liquid ammonia between two gas carriers, theGreen 
Pioneerand the Navigator Global, at the Western Anchorage WA19, 20 nautical 
miles (NM) from Port Dampier in Pilbara, Western Australia.

This landmark trial showcased lightering and simulated bunkering operations, 
transferring 2,700 metric tonnes (MT) of liquid ammonia at a rate of 700-800 
cubic metres per hour (m³/hr). The location was strategically chosen for its 
operational advantages, including an existing ammonia terminal, longstanding 
expertise in ammonia handling, a dedicated large anchorage, and a safe distance 
from shore.

Titled " Path to zero-carbon shipping, insights from ammonia transfer trial 
in the Pilbara", the report outlines how the trial specifically addressed 
technical, logistical, safety, and regulatory requirements associated with 
ammonia transfer within an operating port's anchorage.

Key highlights from the safety studies 

Comprehensive safety studies were structured around four key areas: 
feasibility, risks, consequences, and response. Findings across all four areas 
confirmed that ship-to-ship ammonia transfer at anchorage can be both safe and 
practicable, provided that recommended safeguards and operational controls are 
implemented.

The safety studies provided quantitative insights into the operational limits 
and emergency preparedness for this trial, forming a reference for future 
pilots and commercial-scale operations.

To establish the allowable weather envelope for safe ammonia transfer 
operations for this trial, a mooring analysis was conducted, referencing prior 
LNG bunkering operations. This analysis, which evaluated 36 different sea 
states, concluded that safe operations are possible up to a maximum wind speed 
of 20 knots and a swell height of 0.3 meters. These conditions are well within 
the weather threshold required to prevent bridge wing collisions.

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) plume dispersion modelling was conducted 
to evaluate potential ammonia release scenarios. A conservative approach was 
taken, simulating a release of 33 m³ ammonia, corresponding to four times the 
volume of the most credible worst-case scenario.

At a wind speed of 10 m/s, CFD results showed that a 33 m3 release on the 
deck of the ship would produce a plume of up to 40 metres tall, 60 meters wide 
and 750 meters long. Within the dedicated anchorage boundary of 1 NM (1,852 
metres), such a release is unlikely to pose safety risks or operational 
disruption to vessels at adjacent anchorage points.

Hazard Identification (HAZID) and Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) 
highlighted 23 medium-level risks specific to the trial that were mitigated 
through the implementation of additional controls, like the use of Emergency 
Release Couplings (ERC), avoiding simultaneous operations (SIMOPS), and 
stationing a standby incident response vessel. These findings form a basis that 
future bunkering operations can adapt and build upon.

Emergency response measures included specification of communication 
protocols, a personal protective equipment (PPE) matrix, the appointment of an 
incident handler, verification of onboard spill kits, and the deployment of a 
firefighting tugboat. Vessel crews also conducted ammonia-specific emergency 
drills to reinforce readiness.

The report also documents the operational aspects of the trial, detailing the 
transfer systems, shutdown arrangements, and a timeline of key events.

Beyond the trial 

The development of ammonia propulsion systems has accelerated, with the first 
two-stroke dual-fuelled ammonia engine expected to be operational early next 
year. IMO's approval of the world's first global emissions pricing framework 
tied to GHG fuel intensities in April 2025 is likely to further position 
ammonia as a viable zero-carbon fuel for shipping. In light of these 
developments, GCMD is continuing its collaboration with industry partners to 
close safety, technical and operational gaps with real vessels and in 
front-running ports.

 Professor Lynn Loo, CEO of GCMD, said, "In the past, bunkering guidelines 
took years to develop and were typically derived from experience with actual 
operations. In this case, guideline development is preceding actual 
commercial-scale operations, making it all the more important that these trials 
are as informative and comprehensive as possible so they can serve as a 
relevant reference for industry bodies in refining safe handling procedures, 
emergency response plans, and operational guidelines.

To access the report, please click here 
<https://gcformd.org/our-publications/?report-id=8205>.

 

]]></description>
		<detail><![CDATA[<ul type="disc"> 
 <li>Comprehensive safety studies confirm that ship-to-ship ammonia transfer at anchorage can be both safe and practicable</li> 
 <li>Thorough planning, infrastructure readiness, vessel compatibility and clear communications are key to ensuring successful ammonia transfers</li> 
</ul> 
<p> <span class="legendSpanClass">SINGAPORE</span>, <span class="legendSpanClass">June 13, 2025</span> /PRNewswire/ -- The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) today released a comprehensive report detailing the learnings of a pioneering pilot successfully completed on 14 September 2024. The pilot involved the ship-to-ship transfer of liquid ammonia between two gas carriers, the <i>Green Pioneer </i>and the <i>Navigator Global,</i> at the Western Anchorage WA19, 20 nautical miles (NM) from Port Dampier in Pilbara, Western Australia.</p> 
<p>This landmark trial showcased lightering and simulated bunkering operations, transferring 2,700 metric tonnes (MT) of liquid ammonia at a rate of 700-800 cubic metres per hour (m&sup3;/hr). The location was strategically chosen for its operational advantages, including an existing ammonia terminal, longstanding expertise in ammonia handling, a dedicated large anchorage, and a safe distance from shore.</p> 
<p> <span id="spanHghltb8c1">Titled &quot;</span> <i>Path to zero-carbon shipping, insights from ammonia transfer trial in the Pilbara&quot;</i>, the report outlines how the trial specifically addressed technical, logistical, safety, and regulatory requirements associated with ammonia transfer within an operating port's anchorage.</p> 
<p> <b>Key highlights from the safety studies</b> </p> 
<p>Comprehensive safety studies were structured around four key areas: feasibility, risks, consequences, and response. Findings across all four areas confirmed that ship-to-ship ammonia transfer at anchorage can be both safe and practicable, provided that recommended safeguards and operational controls are implemented.</p> 
<p>The safety studies provided quantitative insights into the operational limits and emergency preparedness for this trial, forming a reference for future pilots and commercial-scale operations.</p> 
<p>To establish the allowable weather envelope for safe ammonia transfer operations for this trial, a mooring analysis was conducted, referencing prior LNG bunkering operations. This analysis, which evaluated 36 different sea states, concluded that safe operations are possible up to a maximum wind speed of 20 knots and a swell height of 0.3 meters. These conditions are well within the weather threshold required to prevent bridge wing collisions.</p> 
<p>Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) plume dispersion modelling was conducted to evaluate potential ammonia release scenarios. A conservative approach was taken, simulating a release of&nbsp;33 m&sup3; ammonia, corresponding to four times the volume of the most credible worst-case scenario.</p> 
<p>At a wind speed of 10 m/s, CFD results showed that a 33 m<sup>3</sup> release on the deck of the ship would produce a plume of up to 40 metres tall, 60 meters wide and 750 meters long. Within the dedicated anchorage boundary of 1 NM (1,852 metres), such a release&nbsp;is unlikely to pose safety risks or operational disruption to vessels at adjacent anchorage points.</p> 
<p>Hazard Identification (HAZID) and Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) highlighted 23&nbsp;medium-level risks specific to the trial that were mitigated through the implementation of additional controls, like the use of Emergency Release Couplings (ERC), avoiding simultaneous operations (SIMOPS), and stationing a standby incident response vessel. These findings form a basis that future bunkering operations can adapt and build upon.</p> 
<p>Emergency response measures&nbsp;included specification of communication protocols, a personal protective equipment (PPE) matrix, the appointment of an incident handler, verification of onboard spill kits, and the deployment of a firefighting tugboat. Vessel crews also conducted ammonia-specific emergency drills to reinforce readiness.</p> 
<p>The report also documents the operational aspects of the trial, detailing the transfer systems, shutdown arrangements, and a timeline of key events.</p> 
<p> <b>Beyond the trial</b> </p> 
<p>The development of ammonia propulsion systems has accelerated, with the first two-stroke dual-fuelled ammonia engine expected to be operational early next year. IMO's approval of the world's first global emissions pricing framework tied to GHG fuel intensities in April 2025 is likely to further position ammonia as a viable zero-carbon fuel for shipping. In light of these developments, GCMD is continuing its collaboration with industry partners to close safety, technical and operational gaps with real vessels and in front-running ports.</p> 
<p>&nbsp;<b>Professor Lynn Loo, CEO of GCMD</b>, said,&nbsp;&quot;In the past, bunkering guidelines took years to develop and were typically derived from experience with actual operations. In this case, guideline development is preceding actual commercial-scale operations, making it all the more important that these trials are as informative and comprehensive as possible so they can serve as a relevant reference for industry bodies in refining safe handling procedures, emergency response plans, and operational guidelines.</p> 
<p>To access the report, please click <a href="https://gcformd.org/our-publications/?report-id=8205" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" style="color: #0000FF"><span id="spanHghlta2c9">here</span></a>.</p> 
<p>&nbsp;</p> 
<img alt="" src="https://rt.prnewswire.com/rt.gif?NewsItemId=AE03996&amp;Transmission_Id=202506130015PR_NEWS_ASPR_____AE03996&amp;DateId=20250613" style="border:0px; width:1px; height:1px;" />]]></detail>
		<source><![CDATA[Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD)]]></source>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landmark study on offloading onboard captured carbon dioxide identifies low port readiness as key barrier to large-scale commercialisation</title>
		<author></author>
		<pubDate>2024-03-19 16:05:00</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[
 * Infrastructure and procedures for handling captured carbon dioxide (CO2) at 
ports are currently inadequate 
 * Defining clear pathways to offload, utilise, and/ or sequester CO2, is 
crucial for large-scale commercialisation of onboard carbon capture and storage 
SINGAPORE, March 19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- A recent study commissioned by the 
Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD), in collaboration with 
Lloyd's Register and ARUP, has identified low port readiness as a major hurdle 
bottlenecking the adoption of Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage (OCCS) system 
as a practicable decarbonisation solution. Whilst the technologies required for 
offloading onboard captured CO2 exist at high levels of maturity, safe 
operationalisation of captured CO2 transfer by trained personnel has not been 
demonstrated.



The report, titled "Concept study to offload onboard captured CO₂," found 
that while a limited number of ports possess the infrastructure to offload 
liquefied CO2 (LCO2), they are primarily designed to handle food-grade CO2. The 
higher purity standards that accompany this use limits the interoperability of 
facilities to handle onboard captured CO2.

The study examined over ten planned LCO2 related infrastructure projects 
worldwide. Located near, or with transport links from, CO2-emitting industrial 
clusters, these projects are likely to handle much larger volumes of captured CO
2 than that from OCCS systems; port infrastructure needed for offloading, 
storing and transporting onboard captured CO2 will likely need to be integrated 
with these projects for economies of scale. However, as many of such projects 
remain in concept phase and have not reached Final Investment Decision (FID), 
ports have not proceeded with offloading infrastructure investments. This 
chicken-and-egg dilemma highlights the overall infancy of the carbon value 
chain.

Furthermore, introducing LCO2 offloading into already complex port operations 
will likely impact port efficiency and operational performance. The need for 
additional buffer zones to address the safety concerns of LCO2 handling and 
storage will also add to existing space constraints at ports and terminals. 

About the study: Addressing the gap in the carbon capture value chain

This 9-month long study aims to address a gap in the onboard carbon capture 
value chain. OCCS has recently gained traction as a potential interim solution 
to help international shipping meet IMO's emissions reduction targets, with 
potential deliberations at future Marine Environment Protection Committee 
(MEPC) sessions. While achieving emissions reductions through OCCS hinges on 
successfully integrating a shipboard-compatible system within space 
constraints, equally important is addressing the fate of captured CO2 by 
establishing its utilisation or sequestration pathways.

This study complements GCMD's Project REMARCCABLE (Realising Maritime Carbon 
Capture to demonstrate the Ability to Lower Emissions) by addressing the 
feasibility of OCCS as a practicable, end-to-end solution at scale. For OCCS 
systems to be operationally feasible, the industry needs to develop a 
collaborative ecosystem to enable the value chain for managing captured CO2. 

By systematically considering the needs of the entire value chain, this study 
evaluated four concept configurations of offloading infrastructure from of a 
possible162 scenarios, identified the operational standards and safety 
guidelines for handling LCO2, developed models for the quantification of costs 
for scaled-up infrastructure, articulated manpower competency frameworks for 
offloading operations, and analysed the potential regulatory scenarios needed 
to address the current uncertainties surrounding LCO2 offloading from OCCS.

Concepts for safe offloading of LCO2

One of the key considerations is to examine how LCO2 can be offloaded safely 
to the appropriate infrastructure.

The study determined that captured CO2 in its liquefied form is likely the 
most efficient and cost-effective option for onboard storage and transport. 
Based on this, the study shortlisted four concepts covering key offloading 
modalities, such as Ship-to-Ship and Ship-to-Shore, serving as building blocks 
that can be combined to cover a wider range of offloading concepts.

In ranking the operability of these concepts, the study identified 
Ship-to-Ship and Ship-to-Shore transfers using an intermediate LCO2 receiving 
vessel as the most promising modalities for offloading at scale, with captured 
CO2 eventually sequestered or used as feedstock for manufacturing synthetic 
fuels.

Ship-to-Terminal transfer of captured CO2 stored in ISO tank containers was 
identified to be more compatible at smaller scales and for end uses that 
require higher grades of CO2. This modality of transfer is also most compatible 
with existing port infrastructure and therefore easier to pilot today.

Safety considerations handling LCO2

Handling LCO2 onboard presents a unique set of safety challenges not commonly 
encountered when handling fuels in shipping. The study offers an in-depth 
examination of hazards, such as asphyxiation and toxicity, if a leak or a loss 
of containment takes place.

Unique to CO2 is evaluation of its storage at conditions near its triple 
point, where the gaseous, liquid and solid phases of CO2 co-exist. Storage at 
or near the triple point is sensitive to impurities, and minor changes in 
temperature and pressure can lead to a phase change from liquid to solid CO2, 
leading to hazardous situations, such as blockage in pipes and build-up of 
pressure.

To address these hazards, a series of safety studies, including a Hazard 
Identification (HAZID) of offloading, Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) and a 
coarse Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA), were conducted and mitigation measures 
and emergency response procedures articulated for handling LCO2.

Professor Lynn Loo, CEO of GCMD, said, "While pilots have successfully 
demonstrated numerous capture technologies onboard ships, it is still uncertain 
how captured carbon on merchant ships can be safely offloaded, and what the 
rest of the value chain looks like. This study sheds light on these challenges, 
and highlights recommendations to holistically address these concerns for 
parties interested in advancing OCCS / LCO2 offloading concepts."

Nick Brown, CEO of Lloyd's Register, said: "The maritime industry requires a 
comprehensive understanding of the safety and operational challenges posed by 
all emissions reduction technologies. This study, which focused on port 
readiness and considerations for the safe handling and offloading of LCO2, 
addresses some of the gaps that exist in the carbon capture value chain and 
will support industry stakeholders in making informed investment decisions 
around carbon capture solutions and the creation of regulatory and operational 
guidelines."

Robert Cooke, Design Lead of Arup said, "As a result of the study, it has 
been promising to see how transferable existing CO2 industrial knowledge is to 
an offloading application. Arup brought together energy and maritime 
capabilities to outline the concepts for onboard captured CO2 offloading and 
develop how this new process can practically and safely integrate into busy 
port environments. We look forward to seeing the technologies and 
implementation develop into effective marine decarbonisation solutions."

To access the full study findings, please download the report here 
<https://www.lr.org/en/knowledge/research-reports/concept-study-to-offload-onboard-captured-co2/>
.

About the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation


The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) was established as a 
non-profit organisation on1 August 2021 with a mission to support the 
decarbonisation of the maritime industry by shaping standards, deploying 
solutions, financing projects, and fostering collaboration across sectors.

Founded by six industry partners namely BHP, BW Group, Eastern Pacific 
Shipping, Foundation Det Norske Veritas, Ocean Network Express and Seatrium 
(formerly Sembcorp Marine), GCMD also receives funding from the Maritime and 
Port Authority ofSingapore (MPA) for qualifying research and development 
programmes and projects. To-date, over 100 centre- and project-level partners 
have joined GCMD, contributing funds, expertise and in-kind support to 
accelerate the deployment of scalable low-carbon technologies and lowering 
adoption barriers. 

Since its establishment, GCMD has launched four key initiatives to close 
technical and operational gaps in: deploying ammonia as a marine fuel, 
developing an assurance framework for drop-in green fuels, unlocking the carbon 
value chain through shipboard carbon capture and articulating the value chain 
of captured carbon dioxide as well as closing the data-financing gap to widen 
the adoption of energy efficiency technologies.

GCMD is strategically located in Singapore, the world's largest bunkering hub 
and second largest container port. For more information, go towww.gcformd.org 
<http://www.gcformd.org/> 

 

]]></description>
		<detail><![CDATA[<table name="logo_release" border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="5" align="right"> 
 <tbody> 
  <tr> 
   <td><img src="https://mma.prnasia.com/media2/2363512/4596207/GCMD_Logo.jpg?p=medium600" border="0" alt="" title="logo" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="118" /></td> 
  </tr> 
 </tbody> 
</table> 
<ul type="disc"> 
 <li>Infrastructure and procedures for handling captured carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) at ports are currently inadequate</li> 
 <li>Defining clear pathways to offload,&nbsp;utilise, and/ or sequester CO<sub>2</sub>, is crucial for large-scale commercialisation of onboard carbon capture and storage</li> 
</ul> 
<p><span class="legendSpanClass"><span class="xn-location">SINGAPORE</span></span>, <span class="legendSpanClass"><span class="xn-chron">March 19, 2024</span></span> /PRNewswire/ -- A recent study commissioned by the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD), in collaboration with Lloyd's Register and ARUP, has identified low port readiness as a major hurdle bottlenecking the adoption of Onboard Carbon Capture and Storage (OCCS) system as a practicable decarbonisation solution. Whilst the technologies required for offloading onboard captured CO<sub>2</sub> exist at high levels of maturity, safe operationalisation of captured CO<sub>2</sub> transfer by trained personnel has not been demonstrated.</p> 
<div class="PRN_ImbeddedAssetReference" id="DivAssetPlaceHolder1"> 
 <p> </p> 
</div> 
<p>The report, titled &quot;<i>Concept study to offload onboard captured CO</i><i>₂,</i>&quot; found that while a limited number of ports possess the infrastructure to offload liquefied CO<sub>2</sub> (LCO<sub>2</sub>), they are primarily designed to handle food-grade CO<sub>2</sub>. The higher purity standards that accompany this use limits the interoperability of facilities to handle onboard captured CO<sub>2</sub>.</p> 
<p>The study examined over ten planned LCO<sub>2</sub> related infrastructure projects worldwide. Located near, or with transport links from, CO<sub>2</sub>-emitting industrial clusters, these projects are likely to handle much larger volumes of captured CO<sub>2</sub> than that from OCCS systems; port infrastructure needed for offloading, storing and transporting onboard captured CO<sub>2</sub> will likely need to be integrated with these projects for economies of scale. However, as many of such projects remain in concept phase and have not reached Final Investment Decision (FID), ports have not proceeded with offloading infrastructure investments. This chicken-and-egg dilemma highlights the overall infancy of the carbon value chain.</p> 
<p>Furthermore, introducing LCO<sub>2</sub> offloading into already complex port operations will likely impact port efficiency and operational performance. The need for additional buffer zones to address the safety concerns of LCO<sub>2</sub> handling and storage will also add to existing space constraints at ports and terminals.&nbsp;</p> 
<p><b>About the study: Addressing the gap in the carbon capture value chain</b></p> 
<p>This 9-month long study aims to address a gap in the onboard carbon capture value chain. OCCS has recently gained traction as a potential interim solution to help international shipping meet IMO's emissions reduction targets, with potential deliberations at future Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) sessions. While achieving emissions reductions through OCCS hinges on successfully integrating a shipboard-compatible system within space constraints, equally important is addressing the fate of captured CO<sub>2</sub> by establishing its utilisation or sequestration pathways.</p> 
<p>This study complements GCMD's Project REMARCCABLE (Realising Maritime Carbon Capture to demonstrate the Ability to Lower Emissions) by addressing the feasibility of OCCS as a practicable, end-to-end solution at scale. For OCCS systems to be operationally feasible, the industry needs to develop a collaborative ecosystem to enable the value chain for managing captured CO<sub>2</sub>.&nbsp;</p> 
<p>By systematically considering the needs of the entire value chain, this study evaluated four concept configurations of offloading infrastructure from of a possible <span id="spanHghlt4c47">162</span> scenarios, identified the operational standards and safety guidelines for handling LCO<sub>2</sub>, developed models for the quantification of costs for scaled-up infrastructure, articulated manpower competency frameworks for offloading operations, and analysed the potential regulatory scenarios needed to address the current uncertainties surrounding LCO<sub>2</sub> offloading from OCCS.</p> 
<p><b>Concepts for safe offloading of LCO<sub>2</sub></b></p> 
<p>One of the key considerations is to examine how LCO<sub>2</sub> can be offloaded safely to the appropriate infrastructure.</p> 
<p>The study determined that captured CO<sub>2</sub> in its liquefied form is likely the most efficient and cost-effective option for onboard storage and transport. Based on this, the study shortlisted four concepts covering key offloading modalities, such as Ship-to-Ship and Ship-to-Shore, serving as building blocks that can be combined to cover a wider range of offloading concepts.</p> 
<p>In ranking the operability of these concepts, the study identified Ship-to-Ship and Ship-to-Shore transfers using an intermediate LCO<sub>2</sub> receiving vessel as the most promising modalities for offloading at scale, with captured CO<sub>2</sub> eventually sequestered or used as feedstock for manufacturing synthetic fuels.</p> 
<p>Ship-to-Terminal transfer of captured CO<sub>2</sub> stored in ISO tank containers was identified to be more compatible at smaller scales and for end uses that require higher grades of CO<sub>2</sub>. This modality of transfer is also most compatible with existing port infrastructure and therefore easier to pilot today.</p> 
<p><b>Safety considerations handling LCO<sub>2</sub></b></p> 
<p>Handling LCO<sub>2</sub> onboard presents a unique set of safety challenges not commonly encountered when handling fuels in shipping. The study offers an in-depth examination of hazards, such as asphyxiation and toxicity, if a leak or a loss of containment takes place.</p> 
<p>Unique to CO<sub>2</sub> is evaluation of its storage at conditions near its triple point, where the gaseous, liquid and solid phases of CO<sub>2</sub> co-exist. Storage at or near the triple point is sensitive to impurities, and minor changes in temperature and pressure can lead to a phase change from liquid to solid CO<sub>2,</sub> leading to hazardous situations, such as blockage in pipes and build-up of pressure.</p> 
<p>To address these hazards, a series of safety studies, including a Hazard Identification (HAZID) of offloading, Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) and a coarse Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA), were conducted and mitigation measures and emergency response procedures articulated for handling LCO<sub>2</sub>.</p> 
<p>Professor <span class="xn-person">Lynn Loo</span>, CEO of GCMD, said, &quot;While pilots have successfully demonstrated numerous capture technologies onboard ships, it is still uncertain how captured carbon on merchant ships can be safely offloaded, and what the rest of the value chain looks like. This study sheds light on these challenges, and highlights recommendations to holistically address these concerns for parties interested in advancing OCCS / LCO<sub>2</sub> offloading concepts.&quot;</p> 
<p><span class="xn-person">Nick Brown</span>, CEO of Lloyd's Register, said:<span id="spanHghlt791a"> &quot;The maritime industry requires a comprehensive understanding of the safety and operational challenges posed by all emissions reduction technologies. This study, which focused on port readiness and considerations for the safe handling and offloading of LCO<sub>2</sub>, addresses some of the gaps that exist in the carbon capture value chain and will support industry stakeholders in making informed investment decisions around carbon capture solutions and the creation of regulatory and operational guidelines.&quot;</span></p> 
<p><span class="xn-person">Robert Cooke</span>, Design Lead of Arup said, &quot;As a result of the study, it has been promising to see how transferable existing CO<sub>2</sub> industrial knowledge is to an offloading application. Arup brought together energy and maritime capabilities to outline the concepts for onboard captured CO<sub>2</sub> offloading and develop how this new process can practically and safely integrate into busy port environments. We look forward to seeing the technologies and implementation develop into effective marine decarbonisation solutions.&quot;</p> 
<p>To access the full study findings, please download the repo<span id="spanHghlt368b">rt <a href="https://www.lr.org/en/knowledge/research-reports/concept-study-to-offload-onboard-captured-co2/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</span></p> 
<p><b>About the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation<br /></b></p> 
<p>The Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) was established as a non-profit organisation on <span class="xn-chron">1 August 2021</span> with a mission to support the decarbonisation of the maritime industry by shaping standards, deploying solutions, financing projects, and fostering collaboration across sectors.</p> 
<p>Founded by six industry partners namely BHP, BW Group, Eastern Pacific Shipping, Foundation Det Norske Veritas, Ocean Network Express and Seatrium (formerly Sembcorp Marine), GCMD also receives funding from the Maritime and Port Authority of <span class="xn-location">Singapore</span> (MPA) for qualifying research and development programmes and projects. To-date, over 100 centre- and project-level partners have joined GCMD, contributing funds, expertise and in-kind support to accelerate the deployment of scalable low-carbon technologies and lowering adoption barriers.&nbsp;</p> 
<p>Since its establishment, GCMD has launched four key initiatives to close technical and operational gaps in: deploying ammonia as a marine fuel, developing an assurance framework for drop-in green fuels, unlocking the carbon value chain through shipboard carbon capture and articulating the value chain of captured carbon dioxide as well as closing the data-financing gap to widen the adoption of energy efficiency technologies.</p> 
<p>GCMD is strategically located in <span class="xn-location">Singapore</span>, the world's largest bunkering hub and second largest container port. For more information, go to <a href="http://www.gcformd.org/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">www.gcformd.org</a>&nbsp;</p> 
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></detail>
		<source><![CDATA[Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD)]]></source>
	</item>
	
</channel>
</rss>